I’ve never used algebra tiles, and when I came to the school
that I’m working at now I was actually given some to use. However, when I asked
how they were used I was only given an old book of transparencies. I looked at
it briefly and then it went into a stack in my cupboard where I keep all the
stuff that will most likely never get around to using. Now having read the
Leitze article I see how they may have helped when I taught my students
factoring. Other than that they would probably be most useful in Algebra 1.
Reading the article also made me wish that I had algebra tiles when I was
working at a Montessori middle school last year. It would have fit with the
curriculum well.
Reading Rubenstein reminded me of what a technical language mathematics
is. I usually tell students that learning math is like learning a foreign
language, only harder because there are calculations involved. Students have to
acquire this language in order to participate and become part of the discourse
community in the classroom. I just finished teaching a chapter about
polynomials and one piece of working with polynomials includes naming them by
their degree and number of terms. I focused on this the first day and continued
to use the specific language (i.e. cubic trinomial) and asked the students to
use it also. It was difficult at first, but I see some improvements. By
explicitly making connections to the roots of the words I hoped to help the
students remember. However sometimes I think that the specific language can
also turn off students, especially when they are behind because they have less
comprehension of what is going on in the classroom when the technical language
is used without explanation.
I liked the fact that the Coburn article had some
alternative approaches to working with polynomials. I never remember factoring
quadratics the way the author proposes, and I like that the fraction methods
makes the zeros more apparent, but my students freak out any time they see a
fraction in a problem. Fractions combined with factoring would cause me
students to use other F words. On the other hand, I liked the “push principle”
used to find the sign of an interval. The last method presented to solve
quadratics seemed a bit complicated. I suppose it’s convenient for finding the
zeros, maybe, but I’m just not sold on it. I had to read through it three times
before I could figure out what he was doing and why.
No comments:
Post a Comment